<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Critique vs. Discussion: What Kind of Feedback Do You Need?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://diymfa.demo.cmsminds.net/community/critique-vs-discussion-what-kind-of-feedback-do-you-need/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://diymfa.demo.cmsminds.net/community/critique-vs-discussion-what-kind-of-feedback-do-you-need/</link>
	<description>Tools &#38; Techniques for the Serious Writer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 05:10:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Connie B. Dowell		</title>
		<link>https://diymfa.demo.cmsminds.net/community/critique-vs-discussion-what-kind-of-feedback-do-you-need/#comment-477</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Connie B. Dowell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://diymfa.com/?p=2041#comment-477</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m definitely in need of a critique or two. I know I&#039;ve got a long way to go, just from my own read throughs of the progress on my current draft, but there&#039;s always those details I know I&#039;ll miss, those parts I think are clear and understandable, but are actually a bit vague or confusing. Serious critique partners or critique groups are hard to find, though.  It&#039;s tough to match up levels of experience, time commitments, critiquing styles and expectations for feedback.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m definitely in need of a critique or two. I know I&#8217;ve got a long way to go, just from my own read throughs of the progress on my current draft, but there&#8217;s always those details I know I&#8217;ll miss, those parts I think are clear and understandable, but are actually a bit vague or confusing. Serious critique partners or critique groups are hard to find, though.  It&#8217;s tough to match up levels of experience, time commitments, critiquing styles and expectations for feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Robin McCormack		</title>
		<link>https://diymfa.demo.cmsminds.net/community/critique-vs-discussion-what-kind-of-feedback-do-you-need/#comment-476</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robin McCormack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2012 23:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://diymfa.com/?p=2041#comment-476</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m in the midst of a 2nd edit so I am the stage of needing critiquing.    Eventually I&#039;ll be ready to discuss or get beta readers.  It&#039;s kind of going slow at the moment.  I&#039;m great at writing first drafts and have a few under my belt.  Now I&#039;m learning how to edit and how to critique.  Quite a process.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m in the midst of a 2nd edit so I am the stage of needing critiquing.    Eventually I&#8217;ll be ready to discuss or get beta readers.  It&#8217;s kind of going slow at the moment.  I&#8217;m great at writing first drafts and have a few under my belt.  Now I&#8217;m learning how to edit and how to critique.  Quite a process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
